10 cool things you can do with Linux and not with windows

Posted February 21st, 2009 by kaikokan

Things you can do with Linux and not with windows

Some people install windows on their netbook (or buy one with windows). I think this is not very smart because the only things you could ever really need windows for (games and photoshop) are not likely to run very well on these things.

Following a list of some of the things you can do with Linux and not on windows (or very difficult)

1. Install a bleeding edge 3d desktop environment on affordable hardware.

I've seen compiz running on extremely (from my view) low end hardware. With incredible results. I'm not saying this is something I would advice you to do, because it does eat resources. But it is possible there's a choice and if you like visual effects on the desktop, there's no match for it.
If you would like something like this on windows you 're going to need bleeding edge hardware.

2. Remote control your system (secure) completely over a minimal network connection.

Using ssh you can control your Linux computer completely over a reasonably slow network connection. This gives you a command shell over internet and if you use key based authentication it's very secure.
Because in Linux everything can be configured from the command line your in complete control.
In windows you have some of this functionality with telnet and rdp which are insecure and for full control of a windows system you 're going to need a big connection.

3. Completely change your desktop environment, replacing everything you see.

In Linux you have a choice of destop environments available many of them differing from each other as light and day. This is so great if your used to windows where you have to edit the registry to change your garbage bin icon! In Linux you can choose the looks of everything, you can replace your desktop environment and on top of that you can configure your desktop to look exactly like you like it.

4. Install several completely different Desktops

In Linux you can install as many desktop environments as you like, and choose which one to start when logging in. So if your girlfriend likes to see a desktop that's more like windows in pink or something like that, and you like a ultra lightweight xfce desktop. It can all be there.

5. Run the system without a GUI desktop

It's possible to run your Linux system without the GUI to save on electricity and system resources. This has many applications. For instance you can run a system booted in text mode as a webserver or as your bittorrent download client while you are away. You can log in to this system from your job, to see how your downloads are going. I can go on and on about the possibilities. Something like this feature is available in windows server 2008,you can start that without gui, but it gives you a very crippled system.

6. Turn your system into a complete media center.

Arguably windows media center could be called a "complete media center" but it doesn't compare in any way to the features you can have with a Linux media center. If you look at the things possible with mythTV or linuxMCE you'll be surprised. The Dreambox is build on Linux for a reason!

7. Easily secure transfer files between computers

It's possible to transfer files between windows computers, it's done all the time. But it's clear why there are so many services for file transfer available on the internet. It's not easy doing this in windows. In Linux you can just copy files over the network and over the internet with one simple command. Almost as easy as local copy's.

8. Recover from hard disk problems

Recovering from disk problems which make your system unbootable is possible in Windows, but it's done most of the time by starting with the insertion of a Linux boot cd. I resurrected many laptops from the dead which were running Linux, just insert live cd, mount the home partition and copy your personal data to another disk. replace disk and copy the data back. Ok it's not always this easy, but my experience with windows is: forget it, if the system is unbootable you'd better have a backup.

9. Install software by choosing it from a list

In Linux there are package managers which give you the possibility to select a program from a very big list, and install it. No surfing the web, no searching for cracks or serial keys because the software is to expensive to pay for. No viruses or malware because the photo editing tool you needed came from a torrent.
Almost every program is free and just two or tree mouse clicks away.

10. Have all software on your system updated to the latest version automatically

In windows all software comes from different sources, licenses expire, things have to be paid.
Linux has tools which make it possible to automatically update your complete system to the latest version.
Every program at it's latest version, security and bug fixes all updated. One of the great benefits of free software and package management.

This are just some of the things you can do with Linux and which are difficult/expensive or even impossible on windows.

Feel free to add to this list by leaving a comment.

Comments have to be authorized and most of the readers are in different time zones, so don't worry if your comments are not published immediately. It can take up to 10 hours.

<---back next--->


11. Be logged in with more

Anonymous 48 weeks 4 days 15 hours 56 min ago

11. Be logged in with more than 1 user, in two ways:
A) several Monitors, keyboards, mice you can use one computer with several users (only limited by the amount of graphic cards you can plug in you computer.
B) with several graphical consoles, by switching it via alt+ctrl+F7 (F8,F9..). At home usually everybody is logged in the main computer (me, wife 2Kiddis) and the F11 console runs a amarok only as jukebox for the living room.

12. install a computer in < 10 min (completly configured): fai-project.org

good article

Anonymous 1 year 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago

I dig the article...its just a shame that Microsoft has a hold over the PC market - you know money and politics. Apple wants to give them a run for their money but keep their prestigious image, so they wont be stressing microsoft anytime soon. I have just begun getting into linux and so far im having fun with it. Its refreshing to know that there is an option when it comes to an OS (I had to get that crap of an OS - Win7Starter out of my netbook). I would love to see what a software company could do with a linux platform, im sure it would make a great commercial OS. In the meantime we just have to show our appreciation to all the guys who put in those long hours to develop linux distributions.

More things that Linux makes easy

Anonymous 1 year 31 weeks 1 day 17 min ago

  1. Without connecting to the Internet what day of the week was 14 October 1066?
    Answer: $ cal 10 1066
  2. What was the time in Perth (Australia) on 2 January 2009 at 14:00 in Melbourne? Elaboration: you're looking at an invite for a meeting that took place 18 months ago at 14:00, sent out by someone in Melbourne. I betcha Winblows will say 11:00a, but the true answer is 12:00noon.

    The trick is that there was daylight saving in both places at the time, but since then, Perth has abandoned daylight saving. Linux keeps all daylight rules since the beginning of time (or more practically, since about 1850), but Windows only keeps the current and one previous rule (if you're lucky).

  3. I log into my linux system in Melbourne, my parents log in from New Zealand. We can each see our local timezone (except, of course in ASCII log files and similar). If I create a file at 11:00am AEST, they see it as 13:00am NZST. But if they need to see things my way ...
    $ TZ=Australia/Melbourne ls -l ...

More then two screens

Anonymous 1 year 46 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago

One thing that is cool about Linux is that unlike windows I can extend my desktop to include more then two screens, ya on Ubuntu I can have as many screens as i like. so with sli i can have up to six screens running Perfect for surveillance and better for Movie development.

Virus attack and Linux Recovery

mariapeter12 1 year 49 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago

One more is that makes Linux special is that the Linux OS is more secure than Windows systems If we consider the virus Attacks and in case of data lost the operation of Linux recovery Is much easier than recovery of Windows based systems.

Need Help

Anonymous 2 years 30 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago

All of this sounds cool but you know what would be cooler?...

If it were actually explained! I seriously would like to try all of them but im not a very expierienced user. I would love some help please.

You only need a little bit of

Anonymous 1 year 5 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago

You only need a little bit of help, its easier than most people think.

Download a Knoppix Live CD, boot from it & see a 3D desktop and more. No install necesary.
Or download other Live operating systems to try without installing like Puppy Linux, MeeGo ...
www.distrowatch.com & www.livecdlist.com are nice sites to visit.

Its easy to get lost in all the bling-bling & bla-bla but luckely
is it also easy to put hundreds of different operating systems on a spare/external hard drive
for testing purposes or normale use.
Its easy to satisfy every wish if we know a way to avoid all the screaming advertising.
Since I discovered Linux (+ UNIX & other free operating systems) do I use my computer most
of the time instead of trying to tweak/tune/crack/hack/... something unwilling & partly known.

11th: VLAN support.

Anonymous 2 years 32 weeks 11 hours 54 min ago

11th: VLAN support.

"No surfing the web, no

Anonymous 2 years 33 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago

"No surfing the web, no searching for cracks or serial keys because the software is to expensive to pay for. No viruses or malware because the photo editing tool you needed came from a torrent."

There are some mistakes in this article (you can't change the recycle bin icon without editing the registry?) but this is just stupid to put in a "cool things you can do with Linux and not with Windows" list. There is plenty of free software for Windows, including the most famous open-source programs such as OpenOffice or Firefox or Gimp. No-one is forced to pirate software. And, contrary to point number 10, my Firefox updates itself to the latest version the moment it is released. I don't have to wait for a distro maintainer to catch up.

And Windows doesn't have a "complete media center": Does Linux do Blu-Ray? Netflix streaming?

This guys on crack

Anonymous 1 year 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago

First, firefox sucks and if you really want to use it yes its on linux too. Open office is also on linux and comes with several distributions. There is also a way to watch netflix (IE6) and yes there are ways to watch blu-ray movies as well (its a bit tricky but it can be done) - so....aside from some compatibility issues, because microsoft has a stranglehold on the PC market, what else do you think windows can do that linux cant?

One Thing Linux Can't Do Well...

Anonymous 2 years 46 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago

...is let the user easily setup a multiple monitor configuration of different resolutions(easily being the operative word). Linux runs very well, but without programs like Adobe CS4, Camtasia, excellent video editing, good native printer and scanner drivers, excellent video card drivers(this one is a show stopper for many potential users). Take for instance my Dell Inspiron E1505 with an ATI X1400 that runs at 1650x1080. With Vista ATI drivers I can plug my analog(!) monitor output into my 52" LCD flat panel TV monitor and it automatically recognizes the monitor and resets the output resolution to full HD, not just full screen, full HD! Linux ATI drivers are incapable of handling that task or easily setting up multiple monitors of differing resolutions.

I would love nothing more than to use openSUSE with KDE 4.2 everyday because I think it is the best desktop OS available. Unfortunately, the people who write the programs I use to earn a living don't believe supporting Linux is a good use of their development funds. What I don't understand is with the similarities of OS-X and Linux, how hard is it to release a Linux version of any program available for OS-X? Until these companies join the party by releasing Linux native programs and Linux users accept that purchasing some applications is acceptable, or Linux developers write professional level apps for video editing and multimedia then Linux will remain in third place behind Windows and OS-X.

Decreasingly true, at least for us

Anonymous 2 years 45 weeks 14 hours 42 min ago

There was a time when we would have agreed with you, but over the last three years we have progressively moved towards an all-Linux cluster. Well, the native OS is Linux.

Perversely it was the release of X-Plane 8 (which we use to validate aircraft designs) on Linux that triggered a renewed interest, Since our XP CAD box was running too slow to simulate accurately we could either buy another box with a fat video card or work around it somehow.

The solution was a shiny new SuSE 10 dual-boot installation with ReiserFS and some hand-massaging of the nVidia driver. Yes, SuSE 10, it was that long ago.

The result was 35% faster than running under the carefully maintained and optimised installation of XP, which saved us from building another box that year. That was useful.

Now? We run XP in virtualisation under varii flavours of Linux, but only when we need Windows. At last, a week free from running antivirus, antispam, anti-whatever updates and scans! Gorgeous....

Surprisingly over 90% of our must-have stuff ran adequately under Qemu, which is not supposed to be that fast, and on machines as basic as this Celeron 540 laptop, which really surprised us. The Core 2 Duo with big RAM and KVM is of course much faster when virtualising XP, but the lappy does work OK.

Could not have done that three years ago - what might the next three years bring?

For your work you are probably stuffed, for the moment. But don't give up! . ;)

Brilliant on Linux Here... Let Me Add

Anonymous 2 years 47 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago

That live 'nix'es are more than cool, they're freely downloadable, keep old boat anchor boxes and lappys out of landfills, in some cases load right into ram and of course all work is easily backed up up wherever you wish to portably move it (along with the live cd os) to other boxes or laptops as you so desire. I travel a great deal and whether at work, home or on the road absolutely love live Linuxes.

The pure pleasure of -not- paying money for an os that is massively BLOATED beyond my wants or needs is to me one of the finest things about so many versions of Linux, certainly a long list of live ones.

Lastly, I listen to a webtech show on WGN radio (Chicago) most every Wednesday night... all pc people but for one Mac guy. Nice techs, really helpful to people, but it's like I'm listening to massochists calling in all night long talking about all the slop that trashes their boxes, things that I've nearly NEVER seen in my 15 or so years of Linux use. It's a sick pleasure listening to a continuum of on-going misery with Gate's Folly.

In truth I feel genuinely sorry for these people as the learning curve seems to me the actual reason they just don't "get" Linux. If Tux is our mascot, I suggest a lemming for M$'s os.

Several of these techs have admitted to liking 'nix but don't say much about it likely for fear of losing the cashflow linked to fixing so many problems Windows so regularly offers the average computer user.

Virtual desktops (Having several complete tasks open at once)

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago

Things I like about using Linux:

1) Lots of desktops open with no noticeable slowdown.
I seem to always have several projects going at the same time.
I usually have four virtual desktops full of things at home and six or eight at work.
Right now I have one desktop where I am surfing the internet, one that has a big technical PDF on it that I got about a quarter of the way through last night and intend to get back to, one that has a Remote Desktop session open over a VPN connection to a machine at work (I am on call this week), and one that has a VMWare Windows machine sitting there defragging its "C" drive.

2) Easy, secure, and quick connections to other Unix/Linux machines.

3) Multi user OS.
When I connect to another machine on the network it does not effect anyone else using that machine.

4) No stress about viruses or worms.
Yes I am sure that if I really tried hard I could find some why to get my machine compromised, but for normal use I just don't stress about it.

5) Synaptic
The real killer app for Linux is the thousands of available programs that can be installed, tried, used, and removed easily and quickly with no reboots. Windows users will just stand there open mouthed when you are in the middle of doing something for them and you open Synaptic and two minutes later have just the right tool needed finish the job. If you really want to freak them out, say "Well, done with that!" and remove the program while they are still standing there.

On Linux but not Windows

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago

One poster hit on it -- the real big thing you can do with Linux that you cannot do - at all - on a Windows machine: relax.

The next up, for me, is to operate without the OS getting in my face. Linux is practically transparent as I work and or play it. On Windows I had to deal with the OS in order to get stuff done. Vista is the worst! Not always, but at all is too much and it was far more than "at all".

Another important one to me is to be able to compute in my manner. If I want to kill X and play in tty3 all day, I can. And speaking of tty3, or 5 or 2. If my desktop goes awry, for whatever reason, I can ctrl+alt+F1 and get to another tty where I can log in as me or root and fix the issue.

Linux is still an OS, things can and do go wrong. However, Linux's ability to gracefull recover is legendary and well deserved. Graceful and Windows don't belong in the same sentence.

If one application fails on a Linux machine it doesn't take your system down with it.

Linux loads only the modules necessary for your hardware. Windows loads all kinds of crap in order to provide "functionality". Well, I get all the functionality I need on Linux and it still only loads a light system based upon my actual hardware. I'm certainly not spartan. Moreover, if I feel like it - I can recompile the kernel to be even more customized to my machine or needs. lol, try that one time on Windows.

But I can certainly get owned quickly on a Windows box. I can get fleeced for shoddy software. I can be made to agree to rediculous licenses in order to use it. I also get to "register" my copy of Windows with the manufacturer, because, ya know -- then need to know that it's really me using it.

I gotta say, I think your list included some pretty silly things. For example, number 3. Please. If people are choosing operating systems because of that...woe is us. That example was pretty lame. Numbers 7 and 8 are simply wrong, they are working on number 9 and number 10 is pretty weak, too. Windows does "automatically" update to the newest version. They do that at least once a month on a Tuesday ;)

Also, some of what you claim Windows cannot do is easily dooable in that OS. Windows has its good points. Not many, but at least 1 or 2.

I'm a Debian guy as well as an old Windows sysadmin and in all honesty, Microsoft should be ahamed of itself. Any fool that tries to say with a straight face that Windows is "better" than Linux is just a fool. They are different and Windows fills the needs of many ignorant people and teenaged fanbois (lol, just like Ubuntu), which is fine. But stacked up next to Debian - Windows is complete crap. lol, and they actually charge for it.

There are crappy Linux distributions. Ubuntu is one of them; duct tape and paper clips, but still -- orders of magnitude more robust, safer, freer, less intrusive, completly customizablem, inherently manageable, most things are automatic, etc., etc., etc. than any version of Windows. Actually, there are many crappy Linux distributions. There are also Linux distributions that run the most important things in the world, like Debian, or a customized red-hat. People can actually rely on Linux.

Oh, another really good one: How many times has Windows let you down, been unreliable? Linux won't let you down. When you're not just looking at porn, playing games, or bothering your 4 online friends with your mindless chatter, you tend to use an OS that can meet other needs. These people tend to run Linux.

Linux may not be "maintenance-free" but ask me how much time I spend maintaining my servers or desktops. lol. about 5 minutes a week. If that. Try that on your Windows box, kid.

--machiner

The tide is turning

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago

The most amazing thing that you can do with Linux is try before you commit.

All one has to do is first boot a Live Linux CD on a Windows host without installing anything on the hard drive.
Add a USB key as your download target and install extras from there. You'll have to do this each time you boot.
Use some software to install the live iso onto a bootable USB key for a faster live system.

When you are ready to try Linux on a hard drive, you have options.
With Ubuntu, run the CD inside Windows and install a dual boot system inside a Windows folder.
Or for the others and for a faster file system responses, either use the install icon on the live media, or install from an install CD/DVD and set it up for dual boot without having to wipe Windows.

With Vista you will probably have to partition some hard drive space. Figuring out how to do this is the hardest step. On others, the Linux install process will allow you to repartition the necessary space as part of the install process.

One of the big benefits of dual boot is that you can create a small FAT partition so that you can share a folder contents between the two systems, using favourite or learned tools on each to manipulate your data.

The second big benefit is that the Linux boot loader allows you to boot multiple OSes. This allows you to install multiple versions of Linux or even Windows on the same hardware. When learning Linux it is beneficial to try all the distros till you find what suits your way of thinking doing best.

Even within one distro, because the GUI server XWindows operates with a variety of Window Managers, one can setup multiple users, each one using a different Window Manager. How cool is that for a beginner who hasn't decided.

And finally Linux has Wine for installing and running lots of Windows software as if natively, but without system crashes and malware attraction, and in some cases because of improved I/O, TCP/IP, kernel responses, and other stuff, even faster.

In my experience, over 50% of dual booters have converted their Windows partition to Linux after 3 years, another 20% after 5 years, and the rest content to continue to use their old Windows install, but continual upgrades on their Linux.

Is this an indication of how many Windows users will eventually be left?

Re: i noticed

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago

Yes, it is possible to move your entry to a different URL while keeping the effect of all incomming links.

First make a new post, be sure to migrate all from the original post, including coments and datetimes.

What??? Don't know how to do this? Post a job request at "link to scriptlance.com removed" or somewhere similar. You can also give them these instructions.

Second, you would cause the following reply to any web browser or bot fetching this stupid URL:

  • HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently error.
  • Location field that will contain the fixed URL.

That way, when Googlebot (or other inferior bots) stumbles upon a http://www.handlewithlinux.com/10-cool-things-you-can-do-with-windows-an... wrong URL, it will request it. It will get the 301 permanent redirect error as a reply, and it will fetch the document from wherever pointed to by the Location field. For all practical purposes, the source page points to where you want the new page to go to.

There you go, the page is now stored at a more appropriate address, and you still get to keep all the incoming links.

thank you!

admin 2 years 49 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago

I hope you posted this to help and not to promote the scriptlance site.
The problem is not bots. There are many sites linking here. This goes pretty fast, I can't ask all these guys to update their links. And it's only the url, if anybody wants to they can use the proper url to link here.
http://www.handlewithlinux.com/10-cool-things-you-can-do-with-linux-and-...
I don't believe the url has a very big impact on any search engine.
And if it does this site has a sitemap pointing to the real url, this will fix it for most bots I assume.

some more ...

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago

  • Symbolic links (real, not just some icon)
  • Loop device (mounting any file as a file system)
    e.g. using a downloaded cd or dvd without burning it
  • Software RAID1 (with the possibility to use the devices independently without the RAID
  • LVM (logical volume manager): changing volumes without changing physical partitions

I can think of many many more each time I'm on a Windows machine. (which happens less and less ;-))

some more ...

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago

- Symbolic links (real, not just some icon)

- Loop device (mounting any file as a file system)
e.g. using a downloaded cd or dvd without burning it

- Software RAID1 (with the possibility to use the devices independently
- without the RAID

- LVM (logical volume manager): changing volumes without changing physical
- partitions

I can think of many many more each time I'm on a Windows machine. (which
happens less and less ;-))

re: some more ...

Anonymous 2 years 47 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago

The big problem with any sort of exercise like this is that ultimately we're comparing apples and oranges. Microsoft has an evolving vision of what they want to accomplish (what markets they want to target; how best to win those markets; etc) with Windows and in spite of some major missteps typical of gigantic organizations, they've been pretty effective at winning those markets. Linux, on the other hand, has no single vision -- it has hundreds. There are some loose, unifying principles, that bind the community together but it's really all over the map and there are distributions out the wazoo. So, realistically, how do we compare the two? For instance, with one exception, everything you mentioned in your post is either false or a half-truth, depending upon how one interprets it (and when):

>- Symbolic links (real, not just some icon)
Microsoft has had reparse-points for quite a number of years. Reparse-points can act like symbolic links but with significant limitations -- they can also do quite a bit more. If we stick to a strict comparison to symbolic links (leaving out the additional features) they are too limited and not well supported in the tools. In Windows Vista, however, in addition to Reparse-points, true symbolic links are available and they work very similar to *nix links.

>- Loop device (mounting any file as a file system)
>e.g. using a downloaded cd or dvd without burning it
While not strictly part of the operating system, there are freeware tools which allow this under Windows (mounting of .iso files in particular) -- does that compare to the same functionality under Linux? The third-party developers who created the tools in Windows are little different from Linux developers, the main difference is simply that any of the many Linux distribution maintainers can choose to make some functionality an "official" part of the distribution whereas Microsoft may see no particular advantage in adopting some third-party's tool; the functionality exists either way. In Windows Server 2008 (and, perhaps, Windows 7?) they are apparently adding the ability to use virtual hard disks interchangeably with physical hard disks which would expand functionality quite a lot.

>- Software RAID1 (with the possibility to use the devices independently
>- without the RAID
Yeah, I'll give you that.

>- LVM (logical volume manager): changing volumes without changing physical
>- partitions
Microsoft's dynamic disks pretty much use the same concept, but they aren't quite as flexible. The addition of virtual hard disks would make the whole thing a bit more general. On the other hand, though LVM has a lot of flexibility and has been around an awful long time, it is still poorly supported in Linux tools like parted. Personally, though I love LVM, in the last four months I have had two filesystems stored in LVM spontaneously go belly-up with no hardware involvement and I have been questioning whether it is really a robust enough environment to trust my data with.

Ultimately, it seems to me that the important question is, does the OS (or its associated environment, tools, etc) do what you need it to do? If it does, and you are happy, then more power to you, whatever your choice. I like a lot of things about Windows; I like a lot of things about Linux; I use both and see no reason to change.

- Les

some more ...

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago

- Symbolic links (real, not just some icon)

- Loop device (mounting any file as a file system)
e.g. using a downloaded cd or dvd without burning it

- Software RAID1 (with the possibility to use the devices independently without the RAID

- LVM (logical volume manager): changing volumes without changing physical partitions

I can think of many many more each time I'm on a Windows machine. (which happens less and less ;-))

1 thing id like to add is,

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago

1 thing id like to add is, linux is less stress, when i had to constantly fix my wifes WINDOWS pc, for malware virus or just operating system wear and tear, she used to blame me, so i gave her no choice and installed linux, now she knows microsoft product cheap crap and slap a pricey sticker on it. she wants software she asks why its not on her computer, i log in remotely and a few seconds later I tell her to check her menu again (while she was still using it - and she has no idea, i log in and install it) and all she says is i swear that wasnt there before.

10 advantages for kids

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago

Hi, nice post, as well as others on similar subject. I've a big challenge for you, or anyone else around: how to explain to kids why one has ditched Windows when Linux can't:
- play several of our Windows games, even with Wine (thankfully, Wow runs)
- some flash games and all based on shockwave don't work
- school is asking kids to do homework on MS Office applications (which they are learning at school)
- they can't use movie maker (I haven't looked yet for equivalents in Linux)
- there is no paint brush equivalent (gimp is too complex, the others are lacking some features)

Yes I know about 5 freedoms. That doesn't cut it for the kids. I use Openoffice, but there are still differences and not all functions work the same or as well (copy/pasting figures, for instance, has issues). Then kids forget to save in the relevant Office format and get into trouble, etc.

Believe it or not, some tux cursors around and them-ability have helped the matter. Still...

Your URL is slightly

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago

Your URL is slightly awkward.

http://www.handlewithlinux.com/10-cool-things-you-can-do-with-windows-and-not-with-linux

i noticed

admin 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago

I noticed this, but there are so many links pointing here already it's not possible to change it.
It also works the other way around.
http://www.handlewithlinux.com/10-cool-things-you-can-do-with-linux-and-...

Netflix watch now

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago

The only thing I need Windows for is Netflix watch now movies. As soon as you can do that on Linux Windows is gone!!!!!!!!!!

Ubuntu 8.10

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago

I replaced my sister's Windows XP ACER Sempron 3100 PC with a new EEE BOX on which I installed Ubuntu 8.10. Once it was up and running I plugged in her Samsung ML-1600 Laser printer. Twenty seconds later a small pop up window informed us her printer was installed and ready for use. How cool is that?

Multilanguage?

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago

Does not work proper in most distributions.

Ever tried the Global IME of Windows? That thing works !

What about system upgrade

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago

You can upgrade your system to the newest distribution version. In debian based distributions all you have to do is:
1. Insert one line in the /etc/apt/sources.list (or change the name, from old distribution release to the new one).
2. apt-get update
3. apt-get distupgrade

That's all. It also upgrades all software in the computer. Try to do the same from WinXP to Vista.

Next big point - easyly restore using back-ups.
You need a list of all installed software (dpkg --get-selections > installed.log). After a reinstall of the system, it's easy to have all the applications back installed, by using:
dpkg --set-selections < installed.log
dselect
press i.
And after this, if you replace the fresh /etc with back-upped one, you'll have your system functioning as it was earlier.

add this

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago

using a memory with bad sector. Linux can use memories with bad sector with flagging bad sectors in ram. This never ever existed in any other system.

The powerfull commandline

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago

You said we can completely control the system remotely. But that is not all. You can do a lot of tasks by using cron. Administrators and users can do a lot with system command line which windows is not capable of doing them. For example, once one of my friends wanted to translate a huge text to local language, he told me he wants to make a list of all the words in the text, in order that they appear, with no duplicates. I don't know if it can be done in windows at all, but a combination of commands did it well in Linux. Even we could filter some of the common words. There is no sed, awk, sort, cat and a lot more command line capabilities in windows.

It's also possible in

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago

It's also possible in Windows to transfer files over the network. And you have never heard of Windows Media Center? About #1. Did you try this on a p2 366Mhz with a 8MB gpu???

Some things I can do with Windows: Browse the internet with proper fonts, use wireless networking, place icons on the desktop (unlike KDE4), play mp3, wma & wmv by default (unlike any non-ubuntu distro), install software just by doubleclick an .exe.

It's also possible in

admin 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago

It's also possible in Windows to transfer files over the network. And you have never heard of Windows Media Center? About #1. Did you try this on a p2 366Mhz with a 8MB gpu???
I work in a mixed windows/Linux environment and yes I do transfer files in windows. But it's not as easy and certainly not as secure as ssh in Linux which is installed by default most times. Media center is a nice thing but it has not the same features as it's Linux counterparts.

Did you try vista aero on a decent affordable MODERN PC? I've seen compiz run on a p3 and on netbooks, there's no reason for anyone to do this. But it's possible.

Some things I can do with Windows: Browse the internet with proper fonts, use wireless networking, place icons on the desktop (unlike KDE4), play mp3, wma & wmv by default (unlike any non-ubuntu distro), install software just by doubleclick an .exe.

"proper fonts" this is no more than an opinion.
wireless networking works for years now in Linux. No problem with that here.
Free to choose your desktop. and place your icons where you like?
play mp3? no problem here
like wma and wmv? these are worth a discussion on themselves, and if you really need them to work out of the box you could choose a ubuntu based distro.
You can install many programs easier in Linux than in windows. And you install something you have to get it first. And if you try to remove it, you'll never know if it's really completely gone.

Could you name some features

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago

Could you name some features that are missing in Windows Media Center? Besides, most open source media centers also run under Windows (e.g. MediaPortal). So that isn't a Linux-only attribute. In fact MediaCenter functionality isn't part of 'Linux' at all.

And no, I didn't try Aero. Because I don't care about a 3d desktop. I just want software to work.

Wireless is still crappy under Linux. Did you ever try to use a Netgear/sitecom/whatever usb stick? It doesn't work! Also I didn't get a Intel 4965AGN to work under Linux Fedora 9. Well, it worked, until I updated my Nvidia drivers and the kernel.

b.t.w. To what Linux version are you referring to in general? It is impossible to make a comparison between Linux and Windows because you have so many different versions of Linux. Do you mean KDE 3.5, KDE 4, Gnome, CentOs, Fedora, Debian, (k)ubuntu, Arch, LFS, openSuse, Redhat? All (combinations) have different features. Just picking the best from all things, cherry picking, doesn't make sense to compare.

Now I come to the point of customization 'everything you see' on the desktop in Linux. I use Kubuntu 8.10 with the Kde 4.1 desktop. It is not possible to place icons & files on the desktop (exept from 'widgets' you can't sort etc), it is not possible to change height & rows of the taskbar (so it's taking up to much space), impossible to use different backgrounds on the multiple desktops. Artwork is a laugh, very childish (yes, that is an opinion). Fonts look horrible in GTK applications (Firefox, Opera etc). General DPI settings are ignored, so everything look bigger/smaller.

Another issue about all the versions of Linux is the installation of the latest software from a list. Some time ago I have tried Fedora 8, and wanted to upgrade from Firefox 2 to Firefox 3. Well, this wasn't possible because it wasn't available in the repositories. Maybe if you wait a couple of months. So it isn't completely true that you can always upgrade to the latest versions. Also your statement of 'easier' installation of software is no much more than an opinion.

I'm not a Linux basher, I like Linux and it has some strong features, but your list is picked to selective and you have generalised this to all Linux distro's.

look here

admin 2 years 49 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago

for some features of Linux media center:

http://www.handlewithlinux.com/why-linux-mce-is-superior-to-windows-mce

wireless is ok in most distributions, this is a quit a modern card. I did experience problems in the past with modern intel cards having their drivers not in the kernel. But I'm pretty sure at least ubuntu works out of the box with this.

If you are a starting user you should go for a distribution aimed at starting users, like ubuntu or linux mint. You know there are specialized distributions without all the features in the list, but most Linux distro's do support package management I believe. If that is what your aiming at.

Your use of kde 4.1 is your own choice isn't it? How much of the vista interface is your choice?

Being limited to the programs in a list has a purpose, I'm sure you are aware of that.
If you want to install software that's not in a stable repository, you might break things.
I wouldn't want my grandmother to do such a thing. In the current state I can actually have my grandmother install software on her system, without worrying she'll break anything. How's that for windows?
And you can install these softwares most of the time, just like in windows with a package.
Be it an rpm or a deb it works just as well as a windows installer. (or better)

"I use Kubuntu 8.10 with the

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago

"I use Kubuntu 8.10 with the Kde 4.1 desktop. It is not possible to place icons & files on the desktop (exept from 'widgets' you can't sort etc), it is not possible to change height & rows of the taskbar (so it's taking up to much space), impossible to use different backgrounds on the multiple desktops."

Sounds like you're using the wrong Desktop Environment to suit your needs--you *do* have a choice...unlike Windows.

"Artwork is a laugh, very childish (yes, that is an opinion). Fonts look horrible in GTK applications (Firefox, Opera etc). General DPI settings are ignored, so everything look bigger/smaller."

Once again, another choice...and I don't disagree, I think Kubuntu (and KDE as whole) is poor environment. There are several options--GNOME, Xfce, etc...or stop using all-in-one environments entirely and switch to something more lightweight.

"So it isn't completely true that you can always upgrade to the latest versions."

Of course it is, because you have unlimited access to the source code. You can (re)compile anything you want and depending on your distribution of choice, it can be as painless as typing "makepkg -si". If you want to upgrade to the latest version of XYZ, it is completely within your power to do so.

you didn't forget anything

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago

ten is a nice short list, of course there are hundreds of others. I'd really like to see a few variations on this. A webmaster's version, a programmer's version, and payclerk's version, a student's version, a version for someone's grandmother? We all have different needs, can different flavours of linux meet them all? Can one flavour meet them all?

You can change hardware

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago

You can change hardware without worrying about drivers and activation. Last week a friend of mine switched from a CD-ROM drive to a DVD-ROM/CD-RW and had to activate his (retail) Windows XP again.

Great article

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago

10 very good points about Linux. I would like to add the following to the list:

1- You can use your 10 year old printer (or most other hardware) with the newest version of Linux. Chances are you will not be able to find Vista drivers for an old printer. I believe the hardware manufacturers are more than happy when a new version of Windows is released because they can force people to replace old hardware (but perfectly functional hardware) by not releasing drivers. Linux has the driver in the kernel so the hardware is useable for quite some time.

2- You can install Linux in 15 minutes or less. Windows will take 45 minutes or more.

3- You can reinstall Linux without digging through a stack of old driver CDs and reinstalling most of your hardware drivers one CD at a time. If it is supported in Linux you will not need a CD. My experience is that Vista is better than XP at automatically plug and playing hardware but is is not as good as Linux.

4- This should be easy to do but is has taken me until today to find a decent free program that will change the wallpaper on the XP desktop at a specified interval (Steve Murphy's Automatic Wallpaper Changer). Webshots does a good job of this but if your display is not the standard 4:3 aspect ratio (and most laptops sold today aren't). You will have to purchase Webshots for the wallpaper to display properly on a wide aspect monitor. I have been able to automatically change my wallpaper for 10 years with KDE.

Install Multilanguage System

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago

My girlfriend is Chinese, I'm French and my Clients work in english. I can start a session at modifying the user interface language at logging.

This is not exisitng at all for windows.

You forgot one big thing...

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago

If you see something that could be improved, you don't have to wait around for somebody else to fix it. If you know how, you can fix it right now, and share your bug fix with the world. It's open source code -- if it was trying to hide malware or spyware, it would be just plain silly to have it in an open source application.

You forgot some things...

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago

11. Virtual desktops completely native and ready to use -- even in command line mode. Instead of buying that expensive 40 inch LCD monitor, or using 2 monitors, just switch to a different desktop. I usually have 4, but you can have as little or as much as you like. Windows has third party downloads, but none of them compete with Linux's native use.

12. Run older hardware with a new and up to date mini-distro of Linux. Maybe when Windows 7 debuts some 'older' hardware will be able to run it, but I am talking REALLY old hardware. You can run mini-distros like Puppylinux or Damn Small Linux on the really old stuff, and still use it securely. You would have to use Windows 98 or even Windows 95 to get that old hard drive to even fit a Windows operating system, let alone any extra software.

13. Interoperability. At least Linux can run a whole heap of Windows native software with Wine. Can a Windows partition even 'see' a Linux partition, let alone run software from it? You might have to download Cygwin to get the job done. With Linux you just mount the partition and --BOOM!-- it is there to use.

14. You can use your computer EXTENSIVELY for 16 hours a day, and you will get tired while your computer just puffs away happily. Unless you like to test Alpha or Beta software, you can count on your Linux box to run the way its suppose to. My Wife's Windows PC runs Windows XP with a 1GHz CPU and 256 MB RAM, and sometimes just by sitting idle it will start to churn and churn, while my Pentium III 650 MHz Linux machine will have this constant hum quietly carrying out its tasks or just sitting still.

15. You don't have to be scared when you leave you Linux machine connected to the internet for extended periods of time. We have to keep telling our daughter to cut off the internet connection every time she uses my wife's Windows PC, for fear of what it's doing over there churning and burning when its supposed to be in idle mode. A Windows machine still is not as secure a machine as a Linux one is.

Thanks

Anonymous 2 years 24 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago

Thanks

one more thing

Anonymous 2 years 49 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago

nice list, but you forgot one more thing, which actually makes all the above thing possible: linux is free (as in libre).
not only you can download it freely without braking any laws, but you can do anything you want with it. you can install it on as many machines you want, you can copy it and lend it to your friends, you can change the system behavior, etc...
because the software is libre it can be inspected and checked what it actually does, so this eliminates the possibility of installing malware, which is a common thing in the windows world. together with crapware, spyware, viruses and so on. this is simply not possible in the world of free software.

linux gives you the freedom of choice, whereas windows is like a prison or a drug. even if you get it free of charge (illegally of course), you will become dependent on it: on its applications, on its files and the system as a whole. windows users' are microsoft's slaves, whether they know it or not.