Do you like windows more? Or are you suffering of interface addiction?

Posted February 26th, 2009 by j00p34

Are we suffering interface addiction?

windows user

I've been a windows user for a very big part of my life, just like the most people in the western world I guess. I've converted myself to a Linux user, and these days I administer a mixed windows/Linux environment.
Sometimes when I've been away from windows for a while, (I really try to avoid the windows machines,I have to do some maintenance now and then) I sit myself at the desktop I know from all these years.

mental reward

And sometimes when this happens I experience a slightly discomforting feeling: It feels nice, like my brain gives out some kind of reward for seating myself at the windows desktop. This pleasure is always very short lived because it's almost immediately replaced by the frustration of crippled and illogical design.

addictive features in interfaces

But still it's there for a moment, it's something that feels a bit like smoking a cigarette after trying to quit smoking for a few days. Only much less strong. This sensation made me think: "might there be some addictive feature to user interfaces, making it difficult to change operating systems?"
I know the brain is built in a way, that it gives us rewards for doing certain things. This is why gambling machines have so many lights. It's rewarding to your brain to look at such a machine.

the answer

A little googling brought me quickly to an excerpt from a book titled the humane interface printed in 2000 which states the following, and I cite :

"If I am correct, the use of a product based on modelessness and monotony would soon become so habitual as to be nearly addictive, leading to a user population devoted to and loyal to the product. Its users would find moving to a competitor's product psychologically difficult. Unlike selling illicit drugs, marketing an addictive interface is legal, and the product is beneficial to its users; in another way, it is just like selling illicit drugs: extremely profitable."

you'll find the complete text here:

http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/book/j_raskin_1.html

There you have it, this book states that it is possible to design an interface which has certain addictive features. And on the contrary to the author, in my opinion this doesn't have to be completely harmless to the user. This might be one of the reasons users are holding back from switching to a clearly superior, less costly solution.

vista adoption

If we look at the adoption of vista, it might even be showing the same problem. Vista is not being adopted by the users, and the massive changes in the interface might be playing a role in this.
I know there are many more reasons to think of why vista is not being easily accepted by the general public.
But wouldn't it be a great laugh if the addiction to the windows XP interface is killing microsoft profit?

Bad for Linux

It's bad for Linux also if this is true, you can't deny it slows down open source adoption if this has such an impact. But knowing such an effect exists is already half the answer. You need to be aware of your problem before you can help yourself ;-)

Think about it!

While it might sound strange at first, just think about it a while. How difficult do you think it is changing mobile phone brands? That's a small interface, still it's difficult to get used to a new interface.
Think about this the next time you give your children a windows computer, you'll be teaching them to use an operating system they will have very much difficulty letting go.

Comments have to be authorized and most of the readers are in different time zones, so don't worry if your comments are not published immediately. It can take up to 10 hours.


I've never really found this

Anonymous 3 years 11 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago

I've never really found this to be a problem personally, but I study UI as a hobby and so I like learning new things.

But I think you're right about this for "the masses" - Vista is just different enough from XP to cause "bumps", and we won't even mention Office 2007 (especially the Ribbon UI).

On the other hand... if an upgrade is required, maybe Microsoft's changing the interfaces of the OS and the office suite could be good for Linux?

Let me explain with an example specific to my workplace. We are to upgrade from XP and Office 2000 to Vista 64 and Office 2007.

Many of our custom applications are having problems and will have to be fixed due to the changes behind the scenes - now, add to that the fact that most of our users are very non-technical and will complain a lot, require training and so forth.

I am proposing to senior management (Finance and IT) that we consider a move to Linux and OpenOffice. We are feeling the financial pinch just as everyone else is, and if we have to retrain to use the Microsoft solution (which will cost a lot of money for software licences, hardware upgrades, recoded applications), why not skip the licence fees and just recode for Linux/OpenOffice and retrain our staff to use the new system.

Many of the general purpose applications we use are web based, so that is simple. And to be honest I think the UI of OpenOffice is closer to Office 2000 than Office 2007 is to Office 2000.

Just tweak GNOME or KDE to look a bit more like the Windows UI and be done with it.

It might work, but then again, I suspect the senior management (like everywhere) are so firmly set in their ways that this will never happen, and we will stay on the upgrade treadmill forever and keep paying the Microsoft tax...

I think it's possible

admin 3 years 11 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago

In many ways the new interface is a problem for windows. And I think many managers know how to work the calculator. We just have to open their eyes and give a little information. Retraining once(open source) or retraining forever(windows)? Make Linux look a bit more like windows, most people don't even know the difference. Change your firefox icon to a big E and install a windows like skin.

There may be some problems, but the good thing is microsoft has put so much money in the redesign that they can't drop it anymore. They "have to" force people in to new habits, this is where linux gets an opening.

Exactly! It is fairly

Anonymous 3 years 11 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago

Exactly! It is fairly simple to make a "Windows-like" taskbar (and you could even skin the button to say 'Start'), and as you say, use a custom icon for the browser, skin for the window bars and so forth.

Most people would know it wasn't Windows eventually, but perhaps if you made it look just like Windows, they'd adjust.

Another theory

Anonymous 3 years 11 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago

maybe

admin 3 years 11 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago

Maybe, but wouldn't that mean that the victims (windows users) have to see microsoft as a powerfull suppressor they can't get away from. Interesting thought. But I don't think you could find any evidence for that.