More reasons to use Linux: How green is Linux?
How green is Linux?
In my previous post 10 things to tell your kids when you ditched windows for linux
One of the comments argued that Linux is no more energy efficient than Windows.
So I did a little research.
- First of all there's the tickless kernel
- Better virtualization support
- Not forced to use anything you don't need
- Low power hardware
- Reusability
- Durability
- Linux green initiatives
- Environmental friendly computers available
- Added benefits of Open Source
The tickless mode is an option in the newest kernels keeping power consumption low by having the processor staying asleep, in the normal state the kernel is waking up the processor on an automated interval. With the tickless kernel it's possible to wake the processor only when there's a real need for it. Effectively saving on power consumption in notebooks and servers alike.
Which brings me to my second point, the tickless kernel brings great benefit in virtualized environments.
I have a single pc standing here running 6 vservers without any problem. These are all servers with dedicated purpose running here in the office. If it wasn't for Linux we would need to actually run several full PC's to handle the same services. The system used here is linux-vserver which gives almost no overhead, you don't notice anything about running in a virtual environment ever. This is just a normal pc which is maybe capable of only running one windows XP instance at reasonable speed. Let alone windows server.
Linux gives you the opportunity to take everything out you don't need, this makes it much more efficient. I can't imagine running a dedicated webserver with a gui. I don't have a clue how someone can come up with the idea of doing this. A Gui eats resources that's obvious and when you are using windows to download a big file at home, when your asleep it's still fully running. I download files while asleep on a minimal resources system.
There's a lot of low power hardware available for Linux, just take a look at soekris boards. Running at about 8 watts. Functioning as a firewall, wifi access point, router and storage gateway at the same time!
How's that for efficiency.
Many hardware devices which have been used to run windows versions which are no longer supported, are thrown away. This has an enormous environmental impact. These devices contain numerous poisonous components. Which often don't get disposed of properly. By reusing this hardware with Linux it's not only preventing new production but also preventing the hardware from being dumped.
Directly related to previous point, Linux doesn't need as much hardware replacement as does windows. You can still run Linux on very old hardware. This is obviously better for the environment. Linux users have been reported to only have to upgrade their hardware 50% of the time windows users do.
There are many initiatives aimed at making Linux greener.
There's intel's lesswatts.org
where you'll find a lot of information about making Linux more energy efficient.
And also IBM's big green initiative.
Many low power personal computers are on the market which have linux installations tuned to low power usage, something you just can't do with windows because you can't legally make your own windows distro.
And red hat seems to get some credit for being environmentally friendly to:
red hat greenest operating system
And there's also the incalculable benefit of open source, we can only imagine how much power is saved by not having to develop the same thing twice (or many more times) because once written it can be reused.
Furthermore Open Source has a faster development track, so energy saving improvements are incorporated sooner.
So still more reasons to use Linux!
This is just a short list,feel free to add to this list by leaving a comment.
Comments have to be authorized and most of the readers are in different time zones, so don't worry if your comments are not published immediately. It can take up to 10 hours.
Popular content
Recent blog posts
- HP linux netbook
- Toshiba Android netbook
- android video terminal
- rugged android phone
- Linux PC Robot < 500$ DIY Linux robot
- Q7 Linux MID nice but missing most important feature
- BD remote for android available soon
- Intelligent Linux based scriptable network camera
- Edge the first foldable dual screen ebook reader/netbook
- iPed chinese for iPad
don't forget to vote if you find something useful!!
- More things that Linux makes easy
9 weeks 13 hours ago - It looks rather like
10 weeks 2 days ago - Performance will be mediocre...
11 weeks 1 day ago - Off-base & Totally Terrible Review
11 weeks 3 days ago - suicidal robot bomber ?
11 weeks 3 days ago - Not a missing feature dumbass!
11 weeks 3 days ago - Impractical device
11 weeks 6 days ago - posting from my edge...
12 weeks 22 hours ago - Yes, running Android makes it expandable.
12 weeks 1 day ago - I have an edge and it is excellent
12 weeks 1 day ago
Navigation
Linux systeembeheer
Linux server

Smallest Linux PC, smaller
than an apple

Linux home automation

Electrical superbike
powered by Linux

Coolest Linux robot ever
transforming,camera,
remote control

Samsung tv Linux hack

Linux multimedia
dream machine

More cool stuff
like this solid gold macbook
at criticalcold.com
Tags
Best karma users
- kaikokan
- uioloio
- martha23
- jake
- j00p34
Categories



Linux can run 10 screens & keyboards from a single PC
Anonymous 1 year 26 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago
Userful has a cool tool (free) that lets you turn 1 PC into Two! http://userful.com/free-2-user
They also have a commercial version that lets you connect up to 10 "stations" (monitor, keyboard, USB hub, etc.) to a single PC. This cuts by 80% the carbon footprint of your PC. and saves about 15 tonnes of CO/2 per year http://userful.com/greenpc
XP = 2hrs, Ubuntu = 3.5 hrs
Anonymous 1 year 26 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago
What we need is to test things against each other comparably. As it happens, my laptop (HP Compaq 6710b) dual-boots XP and Ubuntu Intrepid.
And guess what? Doing the same things (web browsing in Firefox and playing music), XP lasts two hours on battery and Ubuntu lasts 3 hours. If I start Powertop and take its hints on shutting things down (e.g. Bluetooth) that goes up to 3.5 hours.
So: comparing doing the same things on both OSes on the same hardware, Ubuntu's battery life is ridiculously better.
Not as green as you hoped
Anonymous 1 year 26 weeks 5 days 19 hours ago
Just to balance things a bit.
On the EeePC 901 you get somewhat better battery life with MS Windows. In this machine the chipset consumes far more than the CPU.
gcc generates poor code compared to compilers from Intel and Microsoft.
Much open source is written by people who shouldn't and is very inefficient indeed. OpenOffice is the obvious example of that.
Inefficiency of free software?
Anonymous 1 year 26 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago
> Much open source is written by people who shouldn't and is very inefficient indeed. OpenOffice is the obvious example of that.
Are you sure you want to use OpenOffice.org as your example of "inefficient" free software code? What we now know as OpenOffice.org started life as the proprietary Star Office. My understanding is the original proprietary code base is where most of the "horrors" of OpenOffice.org lie.
Windows needs more CD's, how
Anonymous 1 year 26 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago
Windows needs more CD's, how much energy does it take to manufacture a CD? Linux you can put on one CD and pass it to all your friends indefinitely.